Voice of America: Jonathan Adler, the Johan Verheij Memorial Professor of Law, said Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s decision not to recuse himself from election-related cases is justified by the traditional understanding of when recusal is required. “As traditionally understood, it requires more than a suspicion or belief about the justice’s ideological orientation or political orientation, but rather a certain sort of bias about the precise issue before the court or the particular parties before the court,” Adler said.
Law's Jonathan Adler discusses Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito's decision not to recuse himself from election-related cases
MEDIA |
June 11, 2024
STORY BY: EDITORIAL STAFF
STORY BY: EDITORIAL STAFF
EXPLORE MORE:
LAW'S JONATHAN ADLER DISCUSSES SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SAMUEL ALITO'S DECISION NOT TO RECUSE HIMSELF FROM ELECTION-RELATED CASES, LAW'S JONATHAN ADLER DISCUSSES SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SAMUEL ALITO'S DECISION NOT TO RECUSE HIMSELF FROM ELECTION-RELATED CASES, SCHOOL OF LAW, LAW'S JONATHAN ADLER DISCUSSES SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SAMUEL ALITO'S DECISION NOT TO RECUSE HIMSELF FROM ELECTION-RELATED CASES, MEDIA
LAW'S JONATHAN ADLER DISCUSSES SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SAMUEL ALITO'S DECISION NOT TO RECUSE HIMSELF FROM ELECTION-RELATED CASES, LAW'S JONATHAN ADLER DISCUSSES SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SAMUEL ALITO'S DECISION NOT TO RECUSE HIMSELF FROM ELECTION-RELATED CASES, SCHOOL OF LAW, LAW'S JONATHAN ADLER DISCUSSES SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SAMUEL ALITO'S DECISION NOT TO RECUSE HIMSELF FROM ELECTION-RELATED CASES, MEDIA